Legal Opinion

Rzepka v. City of Solon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2009No. 2008-1303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*381{¶ 1} This is an appeal from the denial of an election contest challenging the constitutionality of a charter requirement. Because appellants failed to establish by the requisite clear and convincing evidence that any claimed election irregularity affected enough votes to change or make uncertain the contested election result, we affirm.

Concurrent-Majority Requirement for Voter Approval of Zoning Changes

{¶ 2} In May 1988, the electors of appellee the city of Solon, Ohio, adopted the following provisions requiring voter approval of proposed zoning changes in both the municipality and in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. Thompson v. KFB InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Asti v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Maschari v. ToneOhio Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. Village of LodiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Smith v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rzepka v. City of SolonOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API