Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Jansen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1932No. Docket No. 8276PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The purpose of the action was to dissolve the bonds of matrimony theretofore and then existing between the parties. Plaintiff alleged extreme cruelty and failure to provide. Defendant denied the allegations of the complaint, seeking no affirmative relief. Certain allegations were made and denials thereto entered, which went to the character and amount of property held by the parties, of which mention will be made hereinafter. The trial court awarded to plaintiff an interlocutory decree of divorce upon the grounds of extreme cruelty, a nonsuit having been entered on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Croley v. California Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Salveter v. SalveterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Horsman v. MadenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API