Legal Opinion

von Bernuth v. von Bernuth

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 17, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On petition for clivorco. Motion for injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, Y. C.

This is a motion for an injunction to restrain the defendant from further prosecuting an action in the supreme court of New York. On October 5th, 1908, the petitioner filed her petition in this court praying for a divorce against the defendant upon the ground of desertion. This petition was subsequently amended and citation thereon was issued and returned by the sheriff not served. An attempt was then made to secure the appearance of the defendant, who was residing in the city of New York, by substituted service. The order for publication *178of the substituted notice was made on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Keyser v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  4. Peck v. . GoodberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Bank of Bellows Falls v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Ertag v. HainesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Brengel v. O'TooleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Stultz v. StultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Zieper v. ZieperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API