Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Nova Transport, LLC

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided June 28, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00191Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION NICHOLAS WAYNE RHODES, § Plaintiff § § v. § No. 1:21-CV-191-DAE § NOVA TRANSPORT LLC et al., § Defendants § ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions and Testimony of Henry Higgins, Dkt. 81, along with all associated responses and replies. I. STANDARD Federal Rule of Evidence 702 sets the standard the admissibility of expert testimony. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,

509 U.S. 579, 597-98

(1993). Rule 702 provides: A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, experience,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API