Legal Opinion

Danville Board of School Directors v. Fifield

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 5, 1974No. 183-73PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendant, Flora Fifield, a teacher in the schools of Danville, Vermont, was notified by the Superintendent of the Danville Schools that her teaching contract would not be renewed for the school year 1973-74. The Danville Teachers Association is the bargaining unit for the teachers in Dan-ville, of which Flora Fifield is a member. Defendant Fifield objected to such refusal to renew her contract and filed a grievance under the master contract between the Danville Board of School Directors and the Danville Teachers Association. The master agreement provides four steps in the grievance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Dix v. Town of DummerstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  3. Hollister v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the School District v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Local No. 3Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Pontiac Police Officers Ass'n v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Timberlane Regional School District v. Timberlane Regional Education Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. City & County of Denver v. Denver Firefighters Local No. 858Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. LAKE COUNTY EDN. ASS'N v. School Bd. of Lake CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API