Legal Opinion

Smith v. Schmitt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs’ judgments referred to in our statement are severally based upon payments made by each of them to the Linnhaven Orchard Company on contracts between them and the company, wherein each of the plaintiffs contracted to purchase from the Linnhaven Orchard Company certain orchard tracts. The trial court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of the suits wherein the judgments were rendered. It follows that in the absence of fraud such judgments are conclusive here.

In carrying out a plan to procure options to purchase real estate- and form a corporation to buy and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Patterson v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rugger v. Mt. Hood Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Crocker v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Amacher v. Western Realty Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Crumley v. Crumley Business CollegeOregon Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API