Legal Opinion

Payne v. Alvarez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 1963No. E-79PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellants were defendants in an action for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by plaintiff arising out of a motor vehicle collision. From an adverse judgment, defendants have appealed.

In his closing argument to the jury, plaintiff’s counsel placed on a blackboard a mathematical formula which he suggested that the jury use in computing the money value of the past, present and future pain and suffering of plaintiff. Defendants objected to the use of such mathematical formula on the ground that it contained figures not adduced in evidence and therefore invaded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ratner v. ArringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Sirmons v. PittmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Perdue v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Allred v. Chittenden Pool Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. T. O. Johnson, Individually and D/B/A Johnson Equipment Company v. Carl Colglazier and Esther ColglazierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. T. O. Johnson, Individually and D/B/A Johnson Equipment Company v. Carl Colglazier and Esther ColglazierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API