Legal Opinion · Dissent

T. O. Johnson, Individually and D/B/A Johnson Equipment Company v. Carl Colglazier and Esther Colglazier

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1965No. 21722_1Published

1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

Holding, as it correctly does, that conduct of the trial and control of the jury argument in a Federal Court is for the Federal Court and not one in which Erie-loosed or Erie-bound, the Judge must trim his sails depending on the nature of the case then being heard, the Court in sweeping terms for all time condemns the so-called unit-of-time argument with or without placard portrayal. I think the practice is neither as earthshaking as made out, or deserving of this universal condemnation. Worse, it is an abandonment of the very life of Maryland Cas. Co. v. Reid, 5 Cir., 1935, 76…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Jones v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1960

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API