Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smiley v. Armstrong

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. File No. 8106Published

1DissentWarren, J.

If the majority opinion, concerning Exhibits 6E, 13H, and 14D, is bottomed on the proposition that these erasures amount to spoiled ballots which should have been returned by the elector but which were deposited in the ballot box instead, and should therefore not be counted on account of ■being spoiled ballots, then this decision, in my judgment, does not fall within the case of Woodruff v. Heltibridle, 37 S. D. 35, 156 N. W. 579, 580. While it is true that considerable is stated as to spoiled ballots in that case, yet the court did not say that spoiled ballots 'were void ballots. As I…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rexroth v. ScheinIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Vallier v. BrakkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. McMahon v. PolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Sweetser v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Voorhees v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API