Legal Opinion

Wright v. NeSmith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1992No. 1901754PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

The defendant, David Wright, appeals from a judgment, entered after a nonjury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, the estate of Mary Helen Patterson as a creditor of the defendant. At trial, Patterson’s estate claimed that Wright had executed a promissory note for $27,500.00, payable to Mary Helen Patterson, and that he had ceased making payments on the promissory note after her death. By a stipulation of the parties, Wright conceded these facts, but he asserted that the loan had been discharged by Patterson and that, therefore, he was neither in arrears nor in default on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mizzell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Eidson v. McDanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Hawk v. BiggioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Carns v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephens v. CaruthersDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API