Legal Opinion

Palmer v. BROADBENT, MAYOR

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1953No. 7997Published

1Opinion of the Court

123 Utah 580 (1953)

260 P.2d 581

PALMER et al.

v.

BROADBENT, Mayor et al.

No. 7997.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Decided August 12, 1953.

Concurring Opinion August 19, 1953.

Orville Isom, Cedar City, for plaintiffs.

Patrick H. Fenton, Cedar City, for defendants.

WADE, Justice.

Plaintiffs, who with others are sometimes referred to as sponsors and petitioners, are residents and voters of Cedar City, Utah, and they petition this court for an extraordinary writ,[1] requiring the defendants, who are the members of the City Council and the City Recorder, to submit to the voters at the next regular city election, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Halgren v. Welling, SEC. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Gressler v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Parker v. California State Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Palmer v. BROADBENT, MAYORUtah Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API