Reffaie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.
Appellant, Heather Reffaie, challenges the trial court’s final judgment, which *1074found her eighty percent comparatively negligent for her slip and fall at a Wal-Mart store, and the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial. Appellee, Wal-Mart, cross appeals, arguing that its proposal for settlement, deemed invalid by the trial court, was clear and definite and strictly complied with the rules of civil procedure. We reverse the appeal in part and order a new trial on damages; we affirm the cross-appeal. We write to briefly discuss our agreement with appellant’s claims that defense…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Special v. BauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Tanner v. BeckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Grushoff v. Denny's Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. CallowayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- HEATHER IRIMI, etc. v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- HEATHER IRIMI, etc. v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018