Booth v. Gades
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellants, who were injured in an automobile accident caused by the alleged negligent, employment-related driving of a firefighter employed by respondent city, challenge the dismissal of their action against city, arguing that the district court erred in concluding that their Drake v. Ryan settlement with firefighter destroyed city’s vicarious liability for firefighter’s alleged negligence. Because appellants did not fully and completely release all claims against firefighter and because city is not entitled to indemnity from firefighter, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Teigen v. Jelco of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Serr v. Biwabik Concrete Aggregate Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Booth v. GadesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010