Legal Opinion

In Re the Rate Appeal of Benedictine Health Center

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2007No. A05-873PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Benedictine Health Center (Benedictine), a nursing facility, challenges the rate established by respondent Department of Human Services (DHS) for medical assistance reimbursement for the reporting years ending September 30, 1994 and 1995. Specifically, Benedictine objects to the disallowance of the amount by which its payments to a self-insured employee health benefit plan (the Plan) exceed the liabilities incurred by the Plan for medical claims made during each reporting period.1 Benedictine argues that the payments are akin to premiums paid for commercial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Mapleton Community Home, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Independent School District No. 12 v. Minnesota Department of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Daniel L. Berglund, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. In re the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API