Legal Opinion

Davenport v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 20, 1993No. 05-91-01973-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

Michael Hugh Davenport appeals five convictions for unlawful delivery of less than twenty-eight grams of amphetamines. Following a plea bargain agreement, appellant pleaded guilty to the offenses alleged in the indictments and true to each enhancement paragraph. A Dallas County magistrate made findings and recommendations. The district court accepted the magistrate’s recommendations. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed a twenty-five year sentence and a $1000 fine in each case.

In each appeal, appellant raises five points of error. He claims the evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Dinnery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kirk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  2. Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  3. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Hester v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API