Legal Opinion
In re: M/T Stolt Flamenco
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 13, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00365Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 13, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk GALVESTON DIVISION § § IN RE M/T STOLT FLAMENCO § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-cv-00365 § § MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before me is a Rule 60 Motion for Relief from Order,1 and Motion to Stay Consideration of Motion to Lift Stay (“Rule 60 Motion”) filed by Limitation Petitioner Hammonia Reederei GmbH & Co. KG (“Hammonia”). See Dkt. 58. Having considered the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, I recommend that Hammonia’s Rule 60 Motion be DENIED.2 BACKGROUND This limitation action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harold S. McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Third Party v. Force Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Ronnie Gene Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., Third-Party v. Crown Rig Building Services, Inc., and Branham Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.