Legal Opinion

People v. Mateo

New York County Courts

Decided June 12, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John J. Connell, J.

The defense seeks an order from this court allowing requests for judicial subpoenas duces tecum to be ex parte and under seal for materials and documents held by various agencies to be used in assisting their preparation of the mitigation phase *71of the above-entitled capital case. The People have opposed that application, arguing that that procedure would contravene CPL 610.20 (3) and CPLR 2307.

In support of their application, the defense claims that they have unsuccessfully attempted to obtain various records relating to the defendant even when supplying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. People v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. Van Dyne, New York County Courts1998
  3. People v. Owens, New York County Courts1999
  4. People v. Mateo, New York County Courts2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API