Pierce v. M'Connell
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the La Grange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
— The plaintiffs in error brought an action of assumpsit against James M-Connell, Doctor James ML Connell, and George D. Parmenter, late partners, trading under the firm of James Mi Connell and Co. Doctor James M-Connell pleaded non assumpsit, and made affidavit of the truth of his plea; James M>Connell appeared and suffered judgment by nil dicit; and the writ was returned not served on the other defendant. The issue was tried by a jury, and a verdict and judgment rendered in favour of the defendant who pleaded.
A deposition was offered in evidence on the trial by the plaintiffs, and a part of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitney v. FerrisNew York Supreme Court · 1813
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Pendleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Vannoy v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- King v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1879