Legal Opinion

State v. Caulder

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 3, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDayid E. Blair, P. J.

Convicted of bigamy, defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury fixing his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for two years.

Only the record proper is here for review, for the reason that the motion for new trial was not filed until three days after sentence was entered upon the verdict. Section 4079, Revised Statutes 1919, requires such motion to be filed before judgment. [See State v. Sparks, 263 Mo. 609; State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. 696; State v. Baird, 248 S. W. 596; State v. Keyger, 253 S. W. 363.]

The information, under which defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  2. State v. PritchettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State v. BairdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. State v. GonceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. State v. NagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clayton E. Gadsden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. State v. TurpinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API