Legal Opinion

State v. Gonce

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Stone Circuit Court. — Hon. ~W. P. Geiger, J uclge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ewing, C.

In 1879 the appellant was indicted for bigamy in Stone county, was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for two years. lie brings the case here and asks its reversal: 1st, Because the indictment is- insufficient. 2nd, Because the court admitted incompetent evidence. 3rd. Because the court gave and refused improper instructions.

1. bigamy : pleading, I. The indictment is sufficient. It charges the offense specifically in the language of the statute. It contains all the elements necessary to constitute a valid indictment for bigamy. “ The grand jurors for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cargile v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Ham's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1834
  4. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BittickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Jackson v. PhalenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. People v. BeeversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API