State v. Saunders
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keokuk District Oourt. Indictment for uttering and publishing as true two forged promissory notes. Trial by jury. Yerdict guilty,' and judgment. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevees, J.
The state introduced one Kirlceras a witness, and he gave evidence tending to establish the crime charged, and it then asked him the following questions: “Do you know anything about Mr. Saunders having given a note with your name ou it at any time. In the first place, did you sign a note with him ?” To which the witness replied: “I have signed with Mr. Saunders.” ■ The witness was then asked: “"Was there ever any question about any such noté you had not signed?” The witness replied, “Yes, sir.” The forego’ing questions were objected to by the defendant, but tbe objections were overruled.
It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . CorbinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- State v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Dibble v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. DesmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- State v. LowryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.