Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1913Published

Writ oe Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.

1DissentJustice Carter

I do not concur in the foreg'oing opinion. The alleged variance was not raised in the trial court. The name of the complaining witness given in the indictment was Rosetta May. She testified that it was Rosalia May. She identified plaintiff in error as the person who had enticed her to his room. He himself admitted that she had been in his room as she claimed but denied her story as to what was said and done there.

Under the earlier authorities, where the name of a third person was necessary to the identity of an offense, proof of a different name raised a fatal variance, and this rule was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Herring v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Kelly v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Davis v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API