Legal Opinion

Standard Crown Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

“It is settled by all the decisions on the subject, with none to the contrary, that the findings of fact, made by a referee and approved by the trial judge, are not subject to review on appeal, if they are supported by any competent evidence.” Kenney v. Hotel Co., 194 N. C., 44, 138 S. E., 349.

The question, therefore, is whether or not there was evidence to support the findings. The plaintiff contends that the letter of 12 January, 1920, from the defendant to the plaintiff and the reply thereto dated 26 January, 1920, constituted a written contract between the parties. The defendant, upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blalock v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Hite v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Kenney v. Balsam Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Palmer v. . LowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Henderson v. . ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Valley Shoe Corp. v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Hill v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Davis v. North State Veneer Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Bank of Chapel Hill v. RosensteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API