Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Target Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 7, 2023No. 3:21-cv-08458Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 BRYON U. JACKSON, Case No. 21-cv-08458-LB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BUT IDENTIFYING 13 v. PLAUSIBLE NEGLIGENCE CLAIM 14 TARGET CORPORATION, Re: ECF No. 64 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Bryon Jackson sued Target Corporation, claiming that a Target employee 19 intentionally hit him with a shopping cart, injuring his kidney.1 Target moved for summary 20 judgment on the grounds that the plaintiff cannot prove an intentional act, it in any event is not 21…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API