Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Osborn

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 22, 2006No. 19-40769PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM FILED BY CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE AND OVERRULING OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION FILED BY CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtors object to the unsecured Proof of Claim filed by Creditor Capital One Auto Finance. Capital One Auto Finance objects to confirmation of the Debtors’ proposed Chapter 13 Plan, which proposes to surrender the vehicle securing Capital One’s claim in full satisfaction of such claim. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B), (K) and (L), over which the Court has jurisdiction…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Citifinancial Auto v. Hernandez-SimpsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  2. Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance v. Rodriguez (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re PartickaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  4. In Re TrejosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  5. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC v. Quick (In Re Quick)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API