Legal Opinion

In re the Dependency of D.C.-M.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 1, 2011No. Nos. 40157-6-II; 40167-3-II; 40177-1-II; 40187-8-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deeen, J.

¶1 KM1 seeks review of a 2009 Pierce

County Juvenile Court order directing her to participate in a psychosexual evaluation as part of the dependency proceedings involving her four daughters, DC-M, JW-M, JM-M, and HM-M, who were ages eight, six, three, and one, respectively, when the order was entered. KM argues that (1) the juvenile court lacks authority to order a psycho-sexual evaluation, (2) the order violates her due process rights, and (3) the order infringes on her constitutional privacy rights. We hold that juvenile courts have inherent authority to order psychosexual evaluations in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of CabalquintoWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Albert M. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Luby v. Da SilvaWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. City of Seattle v. StalsbrotenWashington Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of R.S.G.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. In re Dependency of E.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API