Legal Opinion

Amonette v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 12, 2007No. Civ. 06-00583 SPK-KSCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT IN-DYMAC BANK, F.S.B.’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge.

Defendant IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (“In-dyMac” or “Defendant”), moves to dismiss Plaintiffs first amended complaint, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. 1 The matter was argued on August 22, 2007. John Harris Paer appeared for Plaintiff Beth S. Amonette, individually and as trustee of the Beth Snodgrass Amo-nette Revocable Living Trust (“Plaintiff’ or “Amonette”). Dane Miller appeared for IndyMac. The primary question is whether Plaintiff,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kuechler v. Peoples BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. Kesling v. KeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Maxine Gilliam v. Joel LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Nielsen v. Field (In re Nielsen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
  5. United States v. PaulsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API