Amonette v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B.
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT IN-DYMAC BANK, F.S.B.’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge.
Defendant IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (“In-dyMac” or “Defendant”), moves to dismiss Plaintiffs first amended complaint, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. 1 The matter was argued on August 22, 2007. John Harris Paer appeared for Plaintiff Beth S. Amonette, individually and as trustee of the Beth Snodgrass Amo-nette Revocable Living Trust (“Plaintiff’ or “Amonette”). Dane Miller appeared for IndyMac. The primary question is whether Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kuechler v. Peoples BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Kesling v. KeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Maxine Gilliam v. Joel LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Nielsen v. Field (In re Nielsen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- United States v. PaulsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.