Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Reid

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1997No. S97G0257Published

1ConcurrenceFletcher, Presiding Justice

The issue in this case is whether uninsured motorist carriers (UMC) deserve special treatment not accorded other defendants in the application of rules for service and the privilege of dismissal and renewal under OCGA § 9-2-61. Because I find no justification for treating UMCs differently, I concur in the affirmance of the Court of Appeals. I write separately because the majority’s opinion fails to clarify the conflict between Bohannon v. J. C. Penney Cas. Ins. Co.1 and Hobbs v. Arthur,2 the issue for which certiorari was granted, and instead relies upon the difficult distinction between void…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. ArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Childs v. CatlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Hilton v. Maddox, Bishop, Hayton Frame & Trim Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Bohannon v. JC Penney Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API