Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2000No. 98-3012198-30122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

224 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2000)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

BRENDA LEE WORKING, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 98-3012198-30122

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Argued and Submitted April 12, 1999

Filed May 6, 1999

Rehearing En Banc Granted Opinion Withdrawn Nov. 1, 1999

Argued and Submitted March 21, 2000--San Francisco, California

Filed September 11, 2000

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

COUNSEL: Karin B. Hoppmann, United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

Wayne C. Fricke,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API