Legal Opinion

Casali v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-29Published

1Opinion of the Court

732 S.W.2d 836 (1987)

292 Ark. 602

Robert E. CASALI, Appellant,

v.

Glenn R. SCHULTZ and J.A. McEntire, III, Appellees.

No. 87-29.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

July 6, 1987.

Davidson Law Firm by Charles Darwin Davidson, Little Rock, for appellant.

Ralph Cloar, Jr., Hilburn, Bethune, Calhoon, Harper & Pruniski by Jack Pruniski, North Little Rock, for appellees.

DUDLEY, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the sale of a unit in a partnership constituted the sale of a security within the meaning of the Arkansas Securities Act. We hold that the transaction constituted the sale of a security.

One of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Securities v. Hawaii Market Center, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Taylor v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Graham v. KaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API