True v. McAlpine
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
By reasonable, as that term is used in the court’s finding, is intended legal, for it is the general rule that a person may make any legal use of his land that he sees fit. Garland v. Towne, 55 N. H. 55, 58; Horan v. Byrnes, 72 N. H. 93; Moore v. Company, 74 N. H. 305.
There is no statute or specific rule of the common law which forbids a person using his land to store automobiles or to engage in that business, even when his land is located in a residential section.
If, therefore, it can be found that the use the defendants propose to make of their land is illegal, it is because it can be found…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mitchell v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Huskie v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Horan v. ByrnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Ladd v. Granite State Brick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Lane v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunlop v. DaigleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Nevins v. McGavockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Brown v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931