Legal Opinion

Butler v. Comic

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1996No. 95-215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a deceit action. Howard Butler, the appellant, brought the action against the appellee, Herman Comic, who is a notary public. Mr. Butler claimed he had suffered a loss because of a deed acknowledgment falsely notarized by Mr. Comic. Judgment was rendered in favor of Mr. Comic because there was no showing that Mr. Butler had relied on the notarization by Mr. Comic. We affirm the judgment.

The undisputed facts are as follows. Two members of the Mackintrush family, Johnny Mackintrush and his sister, presented a deed to be notarized. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler Motor Co., Inc. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Roach v. Concord Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Grandjean v. GrandjeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. FIDELITY MORTG. CO. OF TEXAS v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Hastings v. Smartmatch Insurance Agency LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API