Legal Opinion
Carney v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2017No. 16-6276PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Ray Carney appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his claims under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Carney v. Okla. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 5:16-CV-00484-R, 2016 WL 4250473 (W.D. Okla. Aug. 10, 2016). He also raises an additional First Amendment claim not considered by the district-court. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the district court’s dismissal on the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims; the First Amendment claim has been forfeited.
Background
Ray Carney, a .state inmate appearing pro se, was convicted of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Davilla v. Enable Midstream Partners L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Millard v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- William Webb, Jr. v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Regan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.