Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
The gravamen of this protest is that a 1958 Chevrolet flat-bed truck, driven to Canada and there mounted with a hy*290draulic jacking system, should, be charged with duty when returned to the United States. The collector assessed the truck, along with the-hydraulic jacking system, at 12 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108).
Plaintiff protests:
* * * that duty-free entry on the truck should be allowed on the basis of the purchase price or on $2500.00 as shown on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Coppersmith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Protest 987529-G of PensickUnited States Customs Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Perez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Mi-Scott International Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989