Legal Opinion

Hayes & Winston v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 25, 2020No. 0500/19PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hayes v. State, No. 500, September Term, 2019 & Winston v. State, No. 556, September Term, 2019 (consolidated). Opinion by Nazarian, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – VOIR DIRE Under Kazadi v. State,

467 Md. 1

(2020), a trial court must, on request, ask during voir dire whether any prospective jurors are unwilling or unable to comply with the jury instructions on the long-standing fundamental principles of the presumption of innocence, the State’s burden of proof, and the defendant’s right not to testify. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – VOIR DIRE – PRESERVATION A criminal defendant must preserve for appellate…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Lopez-Villa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Sequiera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. Lopez-Villa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API