Hayes & Winston v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Hayes v. State, No. 500, September Term, 2019 & Winston v. State, No. 556, September Term, 2019 (consolidated). Opinion by Nazarian, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – VOIR DIRE Under Kazadi v. State,
467 Md. 1
(2020), a trial court must, on request, ask during voir dire whether any prospective jurors are unwilling or unable to comply with the jury instructions on the long-standing fundamental principles of the presumption of innocence, the State’s burden of proof, and the defendant’s right not to testify. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – VOIR DIRE – PRESERVATION A criminal defendant must preserve for appellate…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Lopez-Villa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Sequiera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Lopez-Villa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022