Legal Opinion
Smith v. Mandel
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 9, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-1542PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12 (b)(7).
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs herein are trustees of TriSouth Mortgage Investors, a business trust organized under the laws of Massachusetts and having its principal office in Atlanta, Georgia. A named trustee is a resident of South Carolina; none of the trustees reside in Florida.
The defendant, Ernest Mandel, is a resident of Florida. The defendant and Jeffrey Mandel had joined together in a venture known as The Mandel Partnership, which had been organized pursuant to the laws…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prescription Plan Service Corp. v. Albert Franco, Individually and as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Royal Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. Armadora Maritima Salvadorena, S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cunard Line Ltd. v. AbneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. MetzgerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.