Legal Opinion
Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 10, 2016No. 2014-1732PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
This case returns to us after a remand to the Southern District of New York. In the first appeal, we reversed the district court’s summary judgment ruling that no accused products met the patent’s “selected unwanted frequencies” limitation and remanded for further proceedings. On remand, the district court granted summary judgment on alternative grounds. Because we agree with the district court that Seagate’s disk drives do not possess a user interface, but conclude that the district court erred by importing limitations into the “command” steps and in granting summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Salvino, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Wi-Lan USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Greenland Contractors I/S v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Salazar v. At&t Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool & Mfg.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.