Legal Opinion
Barnhart v. DeMarco (In re DeMarco)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 2011No. Bankruptcy No. 10-13033-MDC; Adversary No. 10-00267-MDCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
MAGDELINE D. COLEMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
Before this Court for consideration is a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) filed by Greg En-gelsbe (“Defendant” or “Engelsbe”). En-gelsbe, along with Anthony J. DeMarco, III (the “Debtor”), is one of several co-defendants named in an amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) filed by Douglas and Sandra Barnhart (the “Plaintiffs”). In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs object to the Debtor’s discharge and seek recovery against various other defendants, including Engelsbe, for alleged violations of certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DemarcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Westlake Flooring Co. v. Staggs (In re Staggs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016