Legal Opinion
In re Sorini
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1925No. Nos. 4462, 4487, 4520PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
These three cases present the same general question and were submitted together. In all three cases timely applications for the allowance of writs of error from this court to review *803judgments of conviction in criminal eases, not capital, in the District Court, were presented to the court below and disallowed. In case No. 4462 the relief sought is an alternative writ of mandamus; in case No. 4487 the relief sought is an alternative writ of mandamus, or the allowance of a writ of error by this court; and in ease No. 4520 an attempt is made to review the order disallowing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- In re GravesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hostetter v. SymesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- (PC)Calderon v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- United States v. HoxieDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1930