Legal Opinion

Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Erie

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 87-65PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLSON, District Judge.

This civil action was remanded to this Court for further proceedings in accordance with the direction of the Court of Appeals, Dispatch, Inc. v. City of Erie, 364 F.2d 539 (3 Cir.1966). When the judgment was vacated, the case proceeded in due course. Plaintiff filed interrogatories directed to defendants and intervenor. Answers were filed and certain objections were heard and determined. Pretrial narrative statements were filed by all parties. A pretrial conference was held. The case then came on for trial which was originally fixed for May 8, 1967. But on that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. City of Chicago v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Capitol Greyhound Lines v. BriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Parker v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  2. Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City Of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API