Legal Opinion
Mooney v. Gantt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 5, 1951No. 4-9570PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEd. F. McFaddin, J.
Appellants sought to cancel an instrument which their mother had executed to the appellee; and from a decree refusing the prayed relief, they prosecute this appeal.
Mrs. L. E. Mooney, being the owner in fee of 120 acres of land in Columbia County, executed and delivered to appellee an instrument, the germane portions of which read :
“CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF SAND AND GRAVEL
“THIS CONTRACT made and entered into on this the 11th day of June, A.D. 1940, by and between Mrs. L. E. Mooney, party of the first part, and C. J. Gantt, party of the second part.
“WITNESSETH:
“For and in consideration of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mansfield Gas Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Millar v. MauneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Lawrence v. MahoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Epperson v. HelbronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Jones v. AinellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keith v. City of Cave SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Town of Lead Hill v. Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- McMillan v. Malvern Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Inman v. Milwhite Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
- Roberts v. Unimin Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.