Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of Seminole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 2004No. 98,038Published

1Dissent

WATT, C.J.,

with whom HODGES, J. joins, dissenting:

T1 I dissent because it seems to me that there is no way to square the majority opinion here with Sharp v. Oklahoma City, 1937 OK 685, 74 P.2d 383; Town of Luther v. State, 1967 OK 59, 425 P.2d 986; City of Claremore v. Town of Verdigris, 2001 OK 91, 50 P.3d 208; and Botsford v. City of Norman, 354 F.2d 491 (10th Cir.1965), which we cited with approval in both Town of Luther and City of Claremore.

1 2 The foregoing opinions make clear that the use by a municipality of the "strip" method to annex additional territory is a political decision with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alice H. Botsford and J. R. Goodwin v. The City of Norman, Oklahoma, a Municipal OcrporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Sharp v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Town of Luther v. State Ex Rel. HarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. City of Claremore v. Town of VerdigrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API