Lockhart v. Corcoran
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
This is an adverse possession case.
The Lockharts filed suit against the Cor-corans in the trial court, claiming title to fifteen acres of land by adverse possession. The Corcorans filed a counterclaim for damages allegedly sustained when they were temporarily restrained by the trial court from cutting timber on the subject land.
Following a trial in which the evidence was presented to the trial court ore tenus, the trial court entered a judgment in which it found that the Lockharts had not established that they owned the fifteen acres. The trial court further ruled in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. ALABAMA a & M UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Grooms v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hayden v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Jemison v. BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holifield v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008