Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Corcoran

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1986No. Civ. 5389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Judge.

This is an adverse possession case.

The Lockharts filed suit against the Cor-corans in the trial court, claiming title to fifteen acres of land by adverse possession. The Corcorans filed a counterclaim for damages allegedly sustained when they were temporarily restrained by the trial court from cutting timber on the subject land.

Following a trial in which the evidence was presented to the trial court ore tenus, the trial court entered a judgment in which it found that the Lockharts had not established that they owned the fifteen acres. The trial court further ruled in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ALABAMA a & M UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Grooms v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Hayden v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Jemison v. BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holifield v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API