Legal Opinion

Townsend Trust Co. v. Reynolds

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 10, 1933No. 43PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering tjie opinion of the Court:

A number of questions were discussed in the argument, *300but in view of the conclusion herein reached, but one will be considered.

The fourth item of the affidavit of defense as set out in the statement of facts expressly states that the plaintiff, neither at the time of the commencement of the action nor ■ “now” holds or has in its possession any note or notes.made ■ or signed by the defendants. This categorically states that the plaintiff was not the holder of the note at the time .suit was brought.

The note was a negotiable instrument and .so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frantz v. Templeman Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1926
  2. Prim & Kimbell v. HammelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hull v. Brandywine Fibre Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  2. Reese v. LietzanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Short & Walls Lumber Co. v. ShestackSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Anderton v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API