Legal Opinion

State v. Deschamps

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 1926No. 11910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

“This case was tried before his Honor, Judge J. W. De-Vore, and a jury on the 9th day of October, 1922. The defendant was indicted for malicious mischief, the specific charge being that he injured the land of one Paul B. Hodge by throwing the live nuts of nut grass thereon. The de fendant was found guilty by the jury, but upon motion his Honor, Judge DeVore, granted a new trial, from which the State appealed. Upon appeal (126 S. C., 416; 120 S. E., 491) the Supreme Court held the trial Judge in error in ordering a new trial, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DeschampsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  4. State v. WelshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BelinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. McGheeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. State v. ChanceySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API