Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. Gelhaus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2017No. 16-15175Published

1DissentWallace, Circuit Judge

The facts of this case are tragic. A boy lost his life—needlessly, as it turns out. We know now that he was carrying only a fake gun, albeit a realistic-looking one. Deputies Gelhaus and Schemmel therefore never were in any real danger and deadly force was not necessary. In view of these facts, the inclination to hold Deputy Gel-haus liable for shooting Andy Lopez is understandable. But it is a well-settled rule that a court may do so only if precedent clearly established at the time of the shooting that the use of deadly force in the circumstances Deputy Gelhaus faced was objectively…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Scott v. HenrichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Eng v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Ross W. Sorrels v. Ronald McKee David Buss Cly Evans Archie Grant Loreli, Cruthers Kay Walter Jim Blodgett Joseph LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Ronald Mendoza v. Sherman Block, Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API