Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Olive

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1939No. 28689PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and decree denying plaintiffs in error relief in an action by plaintiffs in error to enjoin defendants in error from conveying property to a person or persons of African descent, under an alleged restriction agreement of owners of certain lots.

Agreement relied upon is in form the identical agreement as that involved in Veal v. Hopps, Pasell v. Olive, 183 Okla. 116, 80 P.2d 275. As pointed out therein, it is a contract entered into by certain lot owners in block N, Oak Park addition to Oklahoma City, providing that no one of the signers-thereof, his or her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christie v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Veal v. HoppsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Education v. SpillersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lyons v. WallenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Fisher v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Schwartz v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Eakers v. CloptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API