Lawson v. Boston Chrysler, Plymouth & Dodge, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
This appeal — which is laden with fatal postural and jurisdictional infirmities— must be dismissed.
The dispositive issue is whether the decision brought for review — which denies the plaintiff’s (appellant’s) motion to amend her petition by correcting a party’s-defendant misnomer — is appealable under 12 O.S. 1971 §§ 952 or 953 or under 12 O.S.Supp. 1980 § 993. We are constrained to hold that the order under consideration can qualify neither as “final” nor as a reviewable interlocutory disposition.
This was an action for damages claimed to have been sustained while plaintiff was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Lake v. LietchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Kepler v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Hart v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- B&B BUCKLES PROPERTIES v. OIL PRODUCERS INC. OF KANSASCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Ellison v. EllisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Ellison v. EllisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.