Rowe v. Dyess
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Application by A. D. Dyess and another to withdraw administration of estate of John T. and Josephine Rowe from the court, opposed by S. P. Rowe. Order granting the application was affirmed by Court of Civil Appeals (177 S. W. 521) and S. P. Rowe brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, P. J.
S. P. Rowe was by proper proceedings appointed and qualified as administrator of the estate of John T. and Josephine B. Rowe, deceased. S. P. Hill was one of the heirs of John T. and Josephine B. Rowe, and as such inherited one-half of the estate, subject to the payment of debts. He sold and conveyed his entire interest in the estate to A. P. Dyess and H. A. Cline. Dyess and Cline, under the provisions of chapter 14, title 52 of Revised Statutes of 1911 attempted to withdraw the estate from administration. They, as provided by article 3384, filed a complaint in writing and caused S. P. Rowe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Turner v. Cross and Eddy, ReceiversTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Wadsworth v. ChickTexas Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rowe v. DyessTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- American National Bank of Beaumont v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- American National Bank of Beaumont v. BiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954