Vetro, Inc. v. Active Plumbing and Heating, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
This case is before me on the Motion for Remand filed by Plaintiff, Vetro Inc., on September 8, 2005, after Defendant, Active Plumbing and Heating, Inc., filed a Notice of Removal with this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). After consideration of the motion and the responsive pleadings, as well as oral argument presented to me by counsel on December 13, 2005, I conclude this court lacks federal question and diversity jurisdiction and, therefore, I GRANT Plaintiffs motion to remand, but I DENY its request for an award of attorney fees and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- L-3 Communications Corp. v. Serco Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014